Archive for the ‘Poker News’ Category

Going All-in with the Short Stack

Posted By : CarbonPoker November 6th, 2009

stack-of-chipsIf you have the biggest stack and are in command of a table, it’s very easy to be aggressive with big bets and raises.  After all, you’re in no real danger of being pushed out of the tournament, and you have the chips to bully other people on the table.

However, things are quite different when you are the short stack and have to fight for your tournament life.  In fact, you’ll have to go all-in at some point (or multiple points) just to get back to a decent chip stack.  Here are a couple things you should look at before deciding whether or not to go all-in with the short stack.

Hand Quality

This is one of the most obvious things you should think about before going all-in.  If you’ve got Q-Q or better pre-flop then you absolutely have to start thinking about shoving.  Even a hand like 9-9 or a drawing hand like Q-J might warrant going all-in if you’re really short stacked.  Of course, good hands don’t always fall to us when we’re short stacked so there is another thing you should definitely look at.

Required Odds

One more thing you need to be aware of before making the decision to go all-in is what your required odds are.  Basically required odds are really good odds that require you to go all-in when sitting on the short stack.  If you believe that you’re getting 2-to-1 odds on any hand then you should be shoving.

For instance, even if you think your opponent has A-K and you only have 10-9 then you should still be shoving since this hand will beat A-K almost 40% of the time.  When you put your opponents on this kind of range and get 2-to-1 odds or better then you need to be going all-in.

  • Share/Bookmark

Kara Scott is New High Stakes Poker Host

Posted By : Comb Over-Under November 5th, 2009

kara scottGSN created waves in the poker world when they decided to do away with one half of the High Stakes Poker broadcasting duo after firing A.J. Benza.  The move was not only a shock to Benza who publicly complained on his blog about it, but it was also a shock to fans of the show since Benza and fellow co-host Gabe Kaplan played quite well off each other.

According to many sources, GSN dumped Benza because they were looking to bring in an attractive female co-hostess.  At the time, rumors were swirling that poker pro Vanessa Rousso was the first choice by the network to fill Benza’s shoes.  Eventually, GSN would state that Rousso was not going to host HSP so former World Poker Tour hostess Shana Hiatt become another name thrown into the mix.

However, we now know that Hiatt won’t be the hostess either since it has been reported that poker pro Kara Scott will become the new commentator on High Stakes Poker.  Scott is one of the rising female professional players since she has earned $453,000 of her $500,000 career winnings in the last years and she’s also finished within the top 250 players in the last two WSOP Main Events.  In addition to her playing exploits, Scott has also done broadcasting work for the European Poker Tour and Poker Night Live.

The only thing that is standing in the way of Kara Scott being officially announced as the new HSP hostess is that she needs to obtain a permit which would allow her to work in the United States.  Without this permit, it would be illegal for Scott to work as the new HSP hostess according to US laws.  But it’s almost a given that Kara Scott will be able to get this permit since GSN is counting on it.

  • Share/Bookmark

Brunson Autobiography Scheduled for Nov 11 Release

Posted By : Comb Over-Under November 3rd, 2009

doylebrunsonThere aren’t too many poker autobiographies that I would be excited about. Doyle Brunson’s upcoming book, however, is one I’ll be buying. Godfather of Poker is slated for a November 11, 2009 release and is building a healthy buzz.

No one in the game has the face, resume and likeability of the Texas Dolly himself. Winner of 10 WSOP bracelets, a Hall of Famer, and an ambassador for the game, I’m sure there was no issue with finding enough content to fill the 372 pages.

Godfather of Poker winds its way through Brunson’s beginnings in poker – far before it was covered by media outlets, legitimized and revered – when games were found in backrooms and were notoriously ‘wild west’. Through his career, Brunson was privy to shocking changes in how the game was perceived and played.

The only constant in poker has been Brunson.

The book’s forward was written by Mike Cochran and features backing from Sexton, Caro and many others in the industry.  Published by Cardoza, you can find this book for $26.95 USD.

  • Share/Bookmark

Betting Odds: Who Will Win the November Nine?

Posted By : Comb Over-Under November 2nd, 2009

wsop chipsWith the November Nine FINALLY coming up soon, we’re ready to go with more coverage, news and whatnot. It seemed like it was so far away, and now it’s almost here. It’s like Christmas… gambling Christmas.

If you didn’t make the final table, and I’m assuming you didn’t, there’s no need to feel left out.

You can still make cash on the final table with a little bit of online wagering. Put your money where your picks are and look at the futures list for the winner of the 2009 WSOP Main Event.

These are futures wagers, where you’re picking the winner. It’s not a horse race, so you can’t just bet to show. Pick the first place horse poker player.

Got a pick? Hit the comments to let me know.

WSOP 1st Place Finish**:

  • Darvin Moon +200
  • Eric Buchman +300
  • Steven Begleiter +500
  • Jeff Shulman +500
  • Joe Cada +900
  • Phil Ivey +325
  • Kevin Schaffel +900
  • Antonie Saout +1200
  • James Akenhead +1200

It looks like a lot of the public money is pouring in on Ivey, so that’s why the profitability is so low on a guy that’s 7th in chips. Sure he’s good, but his name is even better.

When looking at value, I like Shulman at +500. His family’s been hot lately, and this could be a winning wager. But what do I know?

** For those of you who don’t know, this is how the wagering works: Think of these numbers as being based on $100 Wagers. For example, if you bet $100 on Joe Cada to win, you’d win $900; $100 on Ivey to win it all, $325 in winnings.

  • Share/Bookmark

Christopher Walken Does Spoken Word ‘Poker Face’, Better than GaGa

Posted By : Comb Over-Under November 2nd, 2009

I get a lot of “Poker Face” tips and news coming through my RSS and inbox, but this is clearly the best. I know last week that Cartman sang the GaGa mega-hit on South Park (great episode, btw), but this Christopher Walken clip is by far the best.

Walken is on a British show called Friday Night with Jonathan Ross and absolutely kills the delivery.

Enough talking, here’s the Christopher Walken Poker Face Video:

  • Share/Bookmark

Poker Pros Tiffany Michelle and Maria Ho are out of the Amazing Race

Posted By : Comb Over-Under November 2nd, 2009

michelle ho amazing raceReality TV Update!

The bubble has burst for Tiffany Michelle and Maria Ho in the Amazing Race. The girls were eliminated in The Netherlands, cutting the field of competitors down to 5 teams.

Ho and Michelle were eliminated when they failed to make it through a series of Dutch challenges that involved a strength testing carnival game (72 unsuccessful attempts for the girls while most teams did it in 1) and a par-8 version of clog golfing.

At the end of the competition, the girls didn’t finish that leg of the race and were eliminated by host, Phil Keoghan.

Ho and Michelle started this leg of the race in 2nd place, but had these ominous words to say before it began:

“Second place is awesome, but we’ve learned from poker that it’s really easy to get comfortable and get involved in pots that you shouldn’t.”

Foreshadowing! I guess that clog-golf was a pot that the girls should have stayed away from.

With the girls eliminated, I’ll probably stop posting about The Amazing Race, but I will continue watching it… only for the Globetrotters. Those guys are awesome.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tiffany Michelle and Maria Ho eliminated on Amazing Race

Posted By : CarbonPoker November 2nd, 2009

Pro poker players Maria Ho and Tiffany Michelle have caused controversy ever since they first appeared on the CBS reality show “Amazing Race”.  The controversy all started when Michelle and Ho said they were volunteer workers for a charity.  This statement was an obvious lie since the two have both made names for themselves, as well as a lot of money, in the poker world.

Unfortunately for these two, their time on the Amazing Race came to an end after the latest episode.  The episode started with the contestants traveling to Amsterdam where Ho and Michelle took second place in the first leg.  But the pair struggled as the race went on and fell back to fifth place as teams raced to a statue.

After getting their next clue, Tiffany Michelle and Maria Ho played a carnival game called High Striker where they attempted to ring a bell by hitting a mallet.  The two failed to hit the bell after 30 attempts and then went on to a golf challenge.  The golf game also proved to be too much for Ho and Michelle since weather conditions were bad and the golf ball was oversized.

So both contestants went back to High Striker where they again spent numerous attempts trying to ring the bell.  72 unsuccessful tries later, Michelle and Ho decided to go back to the golf course and try to complete each of the 3 holes in 8 strokes or fewer.  Due to the cold wind, and their fatigue from all of the attempts at High Striker, Tiffany Michelle and Maria Ho could not complete the challenge.  They were eventually greeted by the show’s host Phil Keoghan who informed them that their run on the show was over.  Following their elimination, Michelle and Ho ended up taking 6th place out of 12 teams overall.

  • Share/Bookmark

Differences in playing Omaha Hi-Lo and Omaha

Posted By : CarbonPoker November 1st, 2009

Players have long heard that it can be very profitable to switch from the more popular Texas Hold’em to playing Omaha.  But just making the simple decision of going from one poker variation to another can be difficult enough.  There is a lot of studying, practice, and patience that is required to make a successful transition.  When you add the fact that Omaha also has two very popular variations in Omaha Hi-Lo and regular Omaha then the switch becomes even tougher.  Here is a quick look at how the two games differ so you can make the transition a little easier.

Getting Quartered

Much like Hold’em, Omaha gives the full pot to the player with the best hand.  Omaha Hi-Lo, on the other hand, gives half of the pot to the best qualifying low hand if there is one.  And one thing about qualifying low hands is that players can often tie for the best one which means they’ll split a quarter of the pot (both players usually hold A-2).  For this reason, you can’t get overly excited when holding the low nut hand because you could actually lose money if you over bet and get quartered.

Starting Hands

When playing Omaha, you’ll find the best hands will be the ones that give you the best possible shot at the nut like A-A-K-K.  In Hi-Lo, you want to get both a hand that is capable of taking the high hand and one that is capable of taking the low hand.  With this being the case, you’ll be hoping to get A-A-2-3 or close to it as far as starting hands go.  So it is in your best interests not to bet too heavily with a hand like A-A-3-10 because the 10 puts you in no man’s land for a high hand.  Obviously this can still be a good hand for half the pot, but just be careful.

Bluffing

Naked bluffing in Omaha is something that can be pulled off sometimes in the later streets of a hand.  However, your luck won’t be quite the same in Omaha Hi-Lo since many players will call you if it goes down to the river.  The reason is that they’ll think they can still get the low hand and this is worth a call to them.  In short, you will almost always be called on the river if somebody thinks you’re bluffing.

  • Share/Bookmark

Switching up your No-Limit Style For Success

Posted By : CarbonPoker October 29th, 2009

pocket_foursNo poker game involves reading opponents as much as No-Limit Hold’em does.  In fact, pretty much every successful No-Limit player is excellent at being able to read their opponents and make the necessary adjustments to keep pace with the table.  And keeping pace with everyone else is imperative if you are going to be unpredictable on the felt.  Here are some tips for how you can switch up your playing style in order to keep the other players guessing.

Avoid Constant Aggression

Most successful No-Limit Hold’em players employ pretty aggressive style of play.  But the problem with some aggressive players is that they maintain this aggression throughout every playing session and never switch their play up.

When this happens, there are some players who will catch on and call anything just to resist these aggressive charges.  So you’ve got to be able to perceive when others are willing to push you to the showdown and switch up your play.

Switching your Play

When you think the table is ready to call all of your semi-bluffs and second-rate hands then you’ll want to switch to a tighter playing style.  This means only playing your strong hands because it will catch a lot of other players in traps.  They’ll think you’re still playing overly aggressive and will try to challenge you which will only allow you to make even more money off of them.

Stay ahead of the Game

You can only fool other players so long with the tight play before they’ll catch on to that as well.  So in order to stay ahead of the curve, you’ll eventually have to switch back again to playing more aggressive.  Making these switches is all about noticing how the table perceives you at any given moment and changing your game accordingly.

  • Share/Bookmark

Nobody Wins in Cleveland – Another Home Game Robbery

Posted By : Comb Over-Under October 28th, 2009

cuffs 2While the Browns are at the depths of NFL suck-i-tude and the Cavs dropped the home opener against the Celtics, you’d figure that the city deserved a bit of a break. Maybe the Poker Players would be winners? Not so!

Home game players in the suburb of Solon were stuck up by  rifle-carrying robbers, stripped of their pants and pepper sprayed while theives took off with about $11K worth of cash (and reportedly some jewelery).

One of the players was outside having a smoke when he was cornered by the gunmen and forced to lead them to the game. The poker game was advertised on a Cleveland area website.

This came only 6 months after a robbery of a massive home game of about $75,000 in a similar area.

In Ohio, home games are legal if the host does not charge a fee or take any rake. I think they should start investing in some security for these high-rolling events, or at least make the meetups a bit more private.

  • Share/Bookmark